amber senior member
    member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://img9.photobucket.com/albums/v27/megas/maat.gif)
Joined: Jan 2002 Gender: Female  Posts: 2,455
| |
garfla full member
   member is offline
Joined: Nov 2002 Gender: Male  Posts: 151 Location: Tampa, Florida
|  | Re: Florida CTs? « Reply #1 on Apr 15, 2003, 9:42am » | |
Florida CTs?YOU AIN'T KIDDIN!!! So many days of no activity and now this? Thanks for the link!
| |
|
Chem11 admin AUGSBB3CM member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/6725/avaspherexl7.jpg)
Joined: Nov 2001 Gender: Male  Posts: 3,781
|  | Re: Florida CTs? « Reply #2 on Apr 15, 2003, 1:01pm » | |
They started up up about 2AM... one big fattie old-skool CT to pop our cherries with.
Had a late night, so I apparently missed all the action later in the morning. Cleared up quick... mostly blue skies and natural clouds as of right now.
|
Looks like you got it wrong again, Jimbo! Sulfur content 'has been increasing'! - J. Reynolds
Obviously there is now an opening for us rank and file both to defend the environmental benefits of air pollution.. what about some comment on whether the "air pollution is good" line is utilisable, perhaps in rallies? - Wayne Hall
What we're able to do now is inadvertent.- Patrick Minnis, NASA |
|